Teah Chavez vs Giulia Alessia Monteleone Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Aug at 04:21 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Chavez vs G. Alessia Monteleone

CAN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Chavez 1 - 0 Monteleone
They have played 2 sets in total, with Teah Chavez winning 2 and Giulia Alessia Monteleone winning 0. The last match between Teah Chavez and Giulia Alessia Monteleone was at the W50 Saskatoon, 12-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Teah Chavez getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chavez | 1 |
| Monteleone | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W50 Saskatoon(08-12-25)
T. Chavez vs G. A. Monteleone H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.56% (15-12) | Career Total W/L | 23.96% (23-73) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Chavez vs G. A. Monteleone Match Preview:
- Monteleone has an edge over Chavez in recent second serve performance, winning 33.12% compared to Chavez's 29.63%.
- Regarding return games, Monteleone also excels slightly, winning 56.61% of second serve points compared to Chavez's 52.5% and slightly outperforming on first serve returns.
- When it comes to saving breakpoints, Chavez narrowly leads with a success rate of 40% over Monteleone's 39.02%.
- Monteleone has a significantly lower match win rate over the past year (22.22%) compared to Chavez's 60%.
- Grass suits Monteleone best with a 33% win rate, while Chavez thrives on hard courts with a 67% win rate.
- Both players have mainly competed in Challengers/ITF events, with Chavez showing a stronger win rate (60%) compared to Monteleone's (28.57%).
- Monteleone has faced tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 203.72 versus Chavez's 234.2.
- If a match reaches a deciding set, Monteleone has a better track record, winning 20% of deciding sets, whereas Chavez has not won any.
- In recent break point conversion, Chavez is more efficient, converting 57.14% of opportunities against Monteleone's 51.02%.
- Given the context, who holds an advantage in the upcoming match? Let's analyze the prediction further.
Editorial Prediction (August 12, 2025, UTC):
Monteleone's recent performance on second serves and return games suggests a slight technical advantage over Chavez. However, Chavez demonstrates strengths in break point conversion and match win rate, indicating overall better performance in pressured situations and across matches.
Chavez's ability to prevail on hard courts—a surface with a higher win percentage—alongside her impressive breakpoint conversion rate, positions her as a formidable competitor.
While Monteleone appears more adept in deciding sets, the combination of Chavez's competitive surface performance and efficient breakpoint management suggests she may have the upper hand in this matchup.
Taken together, these factors make Chavez the likely winner in the upcoming match, given her consistent performance and better conversion rates.
Teah Chavez vs Giulia Alessia Monteleone Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Chavez vs G. A. Monteleone H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:2:36 | Average Match Time | 1:2:36 |
| 67% (28/42) | 1st Serve % | 56% (29/52) |
| 64% (18/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 41% (12/29) |
| 71% (10/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (8/23) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 62% (32/52) | Return Points Win % | 33% (14/42) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Chavez Recent Matches Played
G. A. Monteleone Recent Matches Played

T. Chavez vs G. A. Monteleone Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.56% (15/12) | YTD Win/Loss | 23.96% (23/73) |
| 56.25% (36/28) | Sets Win/Loss | 26.47% (54/150) |
| 52.32% (316/288) | Games Win/Loss | 37.12% (614/1040) |
| 64.29% (9/5) | Hard Win/Loss | 21.88% (14/50) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 28.00% (7/18) |
| 46.15% (6/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 37 | Aces Total | 9 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 86 | Total Double Faults | 104 |
| 1:44:20 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 349.19 | Average Opponent Rank | 169.6 |
| 64% (1247/1948) | 1st Serve % | 69% (1619/2361) |
| 58% (728/1247) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (742/1619) |
| 45% (318/701) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (272/742) |
| 46% (119/256) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (113/239) |
| 47% (918/1935) | Return Points Win % | 42% (1039/2485) |
| 55.56% (15/12) | Challenger W/L | 31.43% (11/24) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 19.67% (12/49) |
| 56% (15/27) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 24% (23/96) |
| 20% (1/5) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 40% (4/10) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (4/12) |
| 80% (15/12) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (26/21) |
| 20% (15/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (26/5) |
| 25% (12/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 3% (70/2) |